Washington, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court has officially declined to hear a petition filed by the California Trucking Association regarding the state’s worker classification statute, known as AB5. This decision closes the final chapter in a legal battle that sought to exempt independent contractors from the law’s strict requirements, a move that industry leaders argued would undermine the viability of the owner-operator model in California.

The legal conflict centered on whether the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA) preempts state laws that affect motor carriers. The CTA argued that AB5 interferes with federal authority by dictating terms that influence prices, routes, and services offered by trucking companies. However, the lower courts had previously ruled that while such laws may have indirect economic effects, they remain within the realm of state power to regulate employment relationships rather than direct operational controls.

AB5 establishes a specific test for determining employee status, stipulating that workers are considered employees if they are under the direct control of a company, perform work that is part of the company’s usual business, or do not maintain their own independent trade. The CTA contended in its lawsuit that this standard effectively forces carriers to purchase and maintain their own fleets and extend employee benefits to independent drivers, thereby altering the fundamental structure of the business.

What This Means for Drivers

For CDL-A drivers and owner-operators operating in California, the upholding of AB5 means the legal pathway to challenge their classification as independent contractors is now exhausted. Fleet managers and trucking companies hiring drivers must continue to navigate the strict criteria of the law, which can significantly increase operational costs for those who violate its provisions. This legal clarity, while frustrating to some, provides a stable framework for determining liability and benefits eligibility for OTR truck drivers working within state lines.

Industry Reaction

The California Trucking Association had previously argued that the law makes it practically impossible to engage with independent contractors without assuming the full burden of employer obligations. Business groups that have long criticized the standard maintain that it stifles the flexibility required in the trucking sector. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which reversed a district court’s initial stay of the law in April, emphasized that the FAAAA was designed to protect carriers from direct state regulation of their operations, not from laws that incidentally raise their costs.

Key Points

• The U.S. Supreme Court denied the petition to review California’s AB5 worker classification law.
• The California Trucking Association argued the law violates the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act.
• The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the law falls within state power despite indirect effects on carrier costs.
• AB5 defines employees based on control, business course, and independent trade status.

Looking for a better trucking job? US Trucker's free job-matching service connects CDL-A drivers, OTR drivers, regional drivers, and owner-operators with 500+ top US carriers. Leave your details in the form on this page and a recruiter will call you within one business day. Trucking companies hiring are looking for reliable drivers right now. Find your next truck driver jobs opportunity on ustrucker.info.

Photo by Shantum Singh on Pexels