Washington, D.C. — The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has opened a 60-day public comment period on petitions seeking to waive its previous decisions to preempt state meal and rest break (MRB) laws in California and Washington. The agency announced that it will review these petitions and make them available in the Documents section of the relevant dockets, specifically FMCSA-2018-0304 for California and FMCSA-2019-0128 for Washington. This move signals a potential shift in how federal authorities handle conflicts between state safety regulations and federal Hours of Service (HOS) rules.
\nThe current regulatory landscape stems from two key decisions made by the FMCSA. On December 21, 2018, the agency granted petitions from the American Trucking Associations and the Specialized Carriers and Rigging Association, ruling that California’s MRB requirements were preempted by federal HOS regulations. Following that precedent, the FMCSA granted a similar petition from the Washington Trucking Association on November 27, 2020, determining that Washington’s MRB laws were also more stringent than federal standards and thus subject to preemption. These rulings were based on the argument that state laws met the criteria for preemption under the U.S. Code because they imposed stricter requirements than the federal baseline.
\nIn August, the FMCSA indicated its intention to consider petitions for waivers from these preemptions, leading to the current comment period that opened on December 26. The agency is asking the public to address specific issues, including the impact of MRB enforcement on driver health and safety, whether state rules worsen truck parking shortages, and if such regulations discourage carriers from operating within those states. Additionally, the FMCSA wants input on whether MRB enforcement affects the resilience of the supply chain. The commenters include the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the Truck Safety Coalition, Citizens for Reliable and Safe Highways, Parents Against Tired Truckers, William B. Trescott, and the state of California.
\nWhat This Means for Drivers
\nFor a CDL-A driver or owner-operator running routes through California or Washington, the outcome of this process could determine daily operational flexibility. If the waivers are granted, state MRB laws would once again take precedence over federal HOS rules in those jurisdictions, potentially altering how drivers schedule their breaks. Fleet managers must monitor these developments closely, as changing break requirements can impact route planning and driver retention. Trucking companies hiring in the West may need to adjust their compliance protocols to accommodate dual regulatory frameworks. This uncertainty is particularly relevant for OTR truck drivers who frequently cross state lines, as they may face different break mandates depending on their location.
\nIndustry Reaction
\nThe trucking industry has been divided on this issue, with safety advocates pushing for stricter state protections and carrier associations arguing that federal preemption ensures a uniform standard. The inclusion of groups like the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the Truck Safety Coalition in the waiver petitions highlights the ongoing tension between labor protections and operational efficiency. Public engagement is a crucial part of the FMCSA’s rule-making process, allowing diverse perspectives to shape the final decision. This opportunity for input ensures that regulations reflect the best interests of the entire industry, from individual drivers to large logistics firms. The agency’s willingness to revisit these preemptions underscores the evolving nature of FMCSA regulations and their impact on the workforce.
\n