BOSTON, Massachusetts — A 1st Circuit appellate court panel has ruled that long-haul team drivers are legally entitled to federal minimum wage compensation for hours spent inside a moving truck's sleeper berth while off-watch, marking a massive shift in how carriers calculate pay for OTR truck driver operations. The high-stakes litigation, originally launched back in 2016 by a group of drivers led by Juan Carlos Montoya against major carrier CRST, challenges the long-standing industry practice of paying team drivers strictly for miles driven or hours behind the wheel rather than all hours committed to the truck.

This landmark decision ventures into legal territory previously unaddressed by federal circuits regarding how sleeper berth time interacts with the Fair Labor Standards Act. While past disputes, such as major litigation involving Walmart years ago, largely centered around the rights and pay structures of solo drivers, team operations present a completely different set of operational hurdles. Long-haul fleets pair drivers specifically to maximize asset utilization and maintain strict compliance with FMCSA regulations regarding hours-of-service, leaving one driver awake at the wheel while the partner is confined to the back.

The core of the legal battle questioned whether the hours accumulated by the resting driver qualify as compensable 'on-duty' time under Department of Labor standards when that driver is confined to the vehicle for 24 hours or more. The court zeroed in on the massive discrepancy between active driving hours permitted under federal limits—capped at 14 hours—and the remaining 10 hours in a full day after accounting for required rest periods. Court footnotes from Montoya's pay history revealed that while his hourly earnings during active training miles exceeded ten dollars, factoring in uncompensated excess sleeper time would have dragged his overall effective pay well below the federal minimum of $7.25 per hour.

What This Means for Drivers

For CDL-A driver teams and fleet operators across the country, this appellate ruling completely rewrites the financial calculus of running dual-driver configurations. When considering truck driver jobs that rely on team transit, motor carriers will now have to reevaluate how they compensate partners for the hours spent rolling down the highway while off-duty in the bunk. Confining an employee to the restrictive physical boundaries of a sleeper berth while a truck is in motion means that time predominantly benefits the motor carrier rather than providing genuine personal freedom for the worker.

Industry Reaction

Attorneys representing CRST argued that resting team members are merely waiting to be engaged, pointing out that drivers can sleep, prepare simple meals, watch media, or browse the internet from the bunk. However, the appellate panel decisively rejected that defense, drawing a direct parallel to firefighters required to wait inside a station house who must be compensated for their constant readiness. The court emphasized that the physical limitations of a moving commercial vehicle prevent true leisure, leaving drivers trapped in a tiny space with basic living essentials that they cannot exit until the vehicle completely stops.

Key Points

• The 1st Circuit ruled team drivers must receive minimum wage for sleeper berth hours beyond mandated rest.
• The case, Montoya v. CRST, originated from a 2016 lawsuit filed by long-haul drivers.
• The court compared resting team drivers to firefighters waiting in a firehouse rather than off-duty police officers.
• Uncompensated sleeper time threatens to push effective hourly wages below federal minimum thresholds.

Looking for a better trucking job? US Trucker's free job-matching service connects CDL-A drivers, OTR drivers, regional drivers, and owner-operator professionals with 500+ top US carriers. Leave your details in the form on this page and a recruiter will call you within one business day. Trucking companies are hiring now.

Photo by Giant Asparagus on Pexels